Between sociology and linguistics: an analysis of online discourses on apostasy

Authors

  • Marcin Deutschmann University of Opole, Poland
  • Jędrzej Olejniczak University of Opole, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2025/74.4/1

Keywords:

apostasy, symbolic power, Catholic Church, discourse analysis, corpus linguistics

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate online discourses on apostasy in Poland, focusing on the Facebook group Apostazja 2020, where users discuss the process of formally leaving the Catholic Church. This study integrates sociological and linguistic perspectives to analyse how apostasy is presented in public discourse.
We apply Pierre Bourdieu’s theoretical framework, incorporating the concepts of field, capital, symbolic domination, symbolic power, habitus and doxa to examine how apostasy challenges the dominant position of the Catholic Church in Poland. In the analysis, we employ two complementary approaches: Corpus Linguistics and the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA), to analyse the approaches and strategies used by the apostates to construct counter-discourses that redefine their position in the religious field and field of power.
The analysis emphasises the approaches employed by the apostates to challenge the symbolic power of the Catholic Church. In the narratives of the apostates, the Church exercises its arbitrary power by taking advantage of its ability to change the rules and generate formal difficulties for the apostates. The struggle to reclaim power is mainly verbalised through nomination and predication strategies in discourse, e.g., by naming the priests and themselves, the apostates attempt to impose their own rules. The orthodox, normalised view on the Church is challenged and the high symbolic capital of the priests is renegotiated in the struggle within and outside of the religious field. Finally, unless provoked by third parties, the apostates do not discuss the issues related to God and faith: their focus is solely on the Church as an institution.

References

Bauman Zygmunt. 1993. Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Boukala Salomi. 2016. “Rethinking topos in the discourse historical approach: Endoxon seeking and argumentation in Greek media discourses on «Islamist terrorism»”. Discourse Studies 18(3): 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616634550.

Bourdieu Pierre. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu Pierre. 1991. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Chrostowski Mariusz. 2023. “«Unholy Alliance»: Identification and prevention of ideological and religious frames between right-wing populism and Christianity in Poland”. Zeitschrift Für Religion, Gesellschaft Und Politik 7(1): 321–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-023-00146-3.

CLARIN WebServices. n.d. Multiemo and LEM.

Coleman Stephen. 2017. Can the Internet strengthen democracy? Cambridge: Polity Press.

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. 1983. Code of Canon Law. Vatican: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

Dettlaff Rafał. 2016. Apostazja a formalny akt wystąpienia z Kościoła katolickiego w kanonicznym prawie karnym. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Kontekst.

Eberts Mirella W. 1998. “The Roman Catholic Church and democracy in Poland”. European-Asia Studies 50(5): 817–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668139808412567.

Enstedt Daniel, Göran Larsson, Teemu T. Mantsinen. 2020. Leaving religion: Introducing the field. In: Handbook of leaving religion. D. Enstedt, G. Larsson, T.T. Mantsinen (eds.). 1–13. Leiden: Brill.

Gillings Mathew, Gerlinde Mautner, Paul Baker. 2023. Corpus-assisted discourse studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grabowska Magdalena. 2023. Odchodząc od wierzeń: Analiza narracyjna dyskursu o apostazji. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.

Grzymała-Busse Anna Maria. 2015. Nations under God: How churches use moral authority to influence policy. Princeton (N.J.): Princeton University Press.

Gręźlikowski Janusz. 2012. “Spór o odstępstwo od wiary i Kościoła”. Teologia i Człowiek 26: 95. https://doi.org/10.12775/TiCz.2014.019.

Gwiazda Anna. 2021. “Right-wing populism and feminist politics: The case of Law and Justice in Poland”. International Political Science Review 42(5): 580–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120948917.

Institute of Church Statistics. n.d. Statystyki nt. apostazji w Polsce. https://www.iskk.pl/badania/religijnosc/303-statystyki-nt-apostazji-w-polsce [access: 12.7.24].

Institute of Church Statistics. 2023. Auarium Statisticum Ecclesia in Polonia. Warsaw: Instytut Statystyki Kościoła Katolickiego (ISKK).

Kieraś Witold, Łukasz Kobyliński, Maciej Ogrodniczuk. n.d. “Korpusomat – a tool for creating searchable morphosyntactically tagged corpora”. https://doi.org/10.12921/CMST.2018.0000005.

Koptyra Bartłomiej, Anh Ngo, Łukasz Radliński, Jan Kocoń. 2023. “Clarin-emo: Training emotion recognition models using human annotation and chatgpt”. International Conference on Computational Science: 365–379. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Luckmann Thomas. 2023. The invisible religion: The problem of religion in modern society. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003257875.

Lyotard Jean-François. 2002. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. 13th print ed., Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Macgilchrist Felicitas. 2020. Textbooks. In: The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. J. Flowerdew, J.E. Richardson (eds.). 525–539. London: Routledge.

Mandes Sławomir. 2020. “Clerical sexual abuse in an illiberal state: The case of Poland”. Journal of Church and State 62(1): 110–134. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/csz089.

Mantsinen Teemu T., Kati Tervo-Niemelä. 2020. Leaving Christianity. In: Handbook of leaving religion. Daniel Enstedt, Göran Larsson, Teemu T. Mantsinen (eds.). 67–81. Leiden: Brill.

Mapa Apostazji. 2020. https://mapaapostazji.pl [access: 12.03.24].

Pannofino Nicola, Mario Cardano. 2018. “Exes speak out, narratives of apostasy: Jehovah’s Witnesses, Scientology and Soka Gakkai”. International Journal for the Study of New Religions 8(1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsnr.34152.

Piasecki Maciej, Tomasz Walkowiak, Maciej Maryl. 2017. Literary exploration machine: A new tool for distant readers of Polish literature. Digital Humanities Conference 2017.

Polish Episcopal Conference. 2016. Dekret Ogólny Konferencji Episkopatu Polski w sprawie wystąpień z Kościoła oraz powrotu do wspólnoty Kościoła. Warsaw.

Porter-Szucs Brian. 2011. Faith and fatherland: Catholicism, modernity, and Poland. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195399059.001.0001.

Ramet Sabrina P. 2017. Controversies in the social and political engagement of the Catholic Church in Poland since 1988. In: Religion, politics, and values in Poland: Continuity and change since 1989. S.P. Ramet, I. Borowik (eds.). 19–40. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43751-8_2.

Reisigl Martin, Ruth Wodak. 2009. The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In: Methods for critical discourse analysis. Ruth Wodak, Meyer Michael (eds.). 87–121. London: Sage (2nd revised edition).

Reisigl M. 2017. The discourse-historical approach. In: The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. J. Flowerdew, J.E. Richardson (eds.). 44–59. London: Routledge.

Statistics Poland [GUS]. 2011. Poland National Census 2011. Warsaw.

Statistics Poland [GUS]. 2021. Poland National Census 2021. Warsaw.

Szymonik Marian. 2022. “Moralny wymiar apostazji. Uwagi w kontekście filozofii klasycznej”. Rocznik Tomistyczny II. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7539270.

Taylor Charles. 2007. A secular age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Tofiluk Jarosław. 2004. “«Apostasia i anastasis» w wymiarze eschatologicznym”. Elpis 6/9/10: 105–115.

Trojanowski Bartosz. 2022. “Limitation of the right to request the erasure of personal data in the context of sacramental matters and canonical status in the Catholic Church in Poland”. Teka Komisji Prawniczej PAN Oddział w Lublinie 15: 341–356. https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.4476.

Weber Max. 1946. Science as a vocation. In: Science and the quest for reality. H.H. Gerth, C. Wright Mills (eds.). 382–394. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Wenz Witold. 2010. “Apostazja i formalny akt wystąpienia z Kościoła. Zasady postępowania w świetle norm kościelnych”. Studia Salvatoriana Polonica 4: 129–151.

Wilson Bryan R., Steve Bruce. 2016. Religion in secular society: Fifty years on. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wodak Ruth. 2015. Critical discourse analysis, discourse-historical approach. In: The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction. K. Tracy, T. Sandel, C. Ilie (eds.). 1–14. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi116.

Zuba Krzysztof. 2010. “The political strategies of the Catholic Church in Poland”. Religion, State and Society 38(2): 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637491003726596.

Žagar Igor. 2010. “Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis”. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6(1): 3–27. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-010-0002-1.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-11

How to Cite

Deutschmann , M., & Olejniczak , J. (2025). Between sociology and linguistics: an analysis of online discourses on apostasy. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 74(4), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2025/74.4/1

Issue

Section

ARTICLES