Between Utopia and Prototype: Idea of Change in the Work of Katarzyna Kobro and Władysław Strzemiński

Authors

  • Jarosław Suchan Institute of Art History, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26485/AI/2025/27/14

Keywords:

avant-garde historicism, modernist idea of change, prototyping, real utopia, unism

Abstract

The avant-garde maintains a dialectical relationship with history. On the one hand, it is oriented toward change, and on the other, it strives to establish an eternal now – a utopia, the achievement of which would end all history and the need for any further change. In this context, Yves-Alain Bois analyzes the historicism of Katarzyna Kobro and Władysław Strzemiński, concluding that the system they created, Unism, was destined to fail because, despite taking into account the workings of history, it did not break with the utopian ideal of unity, towards which art and the social world were ultimately intended to strive. This text is a polemic against this thesis and, at the same time, an expression of doubt regarding François Jullien's suggestions that utopian thinking, associated with projecting great change, is counterproductive and, in fact, counteracts the possibility of a genuine transformation of the world. In this text, I propose a pragmatic approach to the relationship between change and utopia, invoking the concept of the prototype for this purpose. I approach the work of Kobro and Strzemiński as successive iterations of the prototyping process, demonstrating the positive relationship between utopian vision and practical action in history.

Author Biography

Jarosław Suchan, Institute of Art History, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

PhD, art historian, writer, curator and lecturer at the Institute of Art History, Jagiellonian University, Krakow. In the years 2006-2022, he was director of the Muzeum Sztuki in Łódź. Curator of many exhibitions of modern and contemporary art presented, among others, at the Centre Pompidou in Paris, Museo Reina Sofia in Madrid, Fundação Serralves in Porto, Gemeentemuseum in The Hague, Universalmuseum Joanneum in Graz, Moderna Museeet in Malmö and Zachęta Gallery in Warsaw. Author of numerous texts on the avantgarde, modernism, contemporary art and museology; editor of monographs on the work of Władysław Strzemiński and Katarzyna Kobro, Tadeusz Kantor, the Polish-Jewish avantgarde and avant-garde museology.

References

Berman Marshall (1988) All That Is Solid Melts into Air. The Experience of Modernity, New York: Penguin Books.

Bois Yves-Alain (1990) Strzemiński and Kobro: In Search of Motivation, [in:] Y.-A. Bois, Painting as Model, Cambridge, Mass. and London: The MIT Press, pp. 123-155.

Degot Ekaterina (2015) Painting in History, [in:] P. Polit, J. Suchan, eds., Władysław Strzemiński: Readability of Images, Łódź: Muzeum Sztuki w Łodzi, pp. 53-66.

Gough Maria (1998) In the Laboratory of Constructivism: Karl Ioganson’s Cold Structures, “October”, no. 84, pp. 91-117.

Gough Maria (2005) The Artist as Producer: Russian Constructivism in Revolution, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Groys Boris (2010) The Weak Universalism, “e-flux journal”, no. 15. Available at: [http://worker01.e-flux.com/pdf/article_130.pdf](http://worker01.e-flux.com/pdf/article_130.pdf) (accessed: 12.07.2010).

Jullien François (2017) De-coincidence: Where Art and Existence Come From, transl. P. Rodriguez, Taipei: National Taiwan University of the Arts.

Jullien François (2024) Ponownie otworzyć możliwości: de-koincydencja i kolejne życie, transl. E. Marynowicz-Hetka, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

Kobro Katarzyna, Strzemiński Władysław (1931) Kompozycja przestrzeni. Obliczenia rytmu czasoprzestrzennego, Łódź: Biblioteka “a.r.”.

Kobro Katarzyna (1933) L’action de sculpter, “Abstraction-Création”, no. 2, p. 27.

Kobro, Katarzyna (1935) [Dla ludzi niezdolnych do myślenia…], “Forma”, no. 3, p. 14.

Kobro Katarzyna (1936) Funkcjonalizm, “Forma”, no. 4, pp. 9-13.

Kobro Katarzyna (1937) [Rzeźba stanowi…], “Głos Plastyków”, no. 1-7, pp. 42-43.

Malevich Kazimir (1921) Unovis. Programmnaja stat’ja, “Iskusstvo”, no. 4, pp. 9-10.

Rosch Eleanor (1978) Principles of Categorization, [in:] E. Rosch, B. Bloom Lloyd, eds., Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates, pp. 27-48.

Strzemiński Władysław (1922-1923) O sztuce rosyjskiej - Notatki, “Zwrotnica”, no. 3, pp. 79-82, no. 4, pp. 110-114.

Strzemiński Władysław (1923) [Określam sztukę...], [in:] Katalog Wystawy Nowej Sztuki, Vilnius: Lux, pp. 19-21.

Strzemiński Władysław (1924) B = 2, “Blok”, no. 8-9, n. pag.

Strzemiński Władysław (1927) Notatki, “Zwrotnica”, no. 11, p. 243.

Strzemiński Władysław (1927) Dualizm i unizm, “Droga”, no. 6-7, pp. 211-225.

Strzemiński Władysław (1932) Sztuka nowoczesna w Polsce, [in:] J. Brzękowski, L. Chwistek,

P. Smolik, W. Strzemiński, O sztuce nowoczesnej, Łódź: Wyd. Tow. Bibliofilów, pp. 59-93.

Strzemiński Władysław (1934) Co myślę o architekturze nowoczesnej, “Wiadomości Literackie”, no. 23, p. 4.

Strzemiński Władysław (1934) [Nasza zawartość wzrokowa...], “Forma”, no. 2, pp. 17-18.

Strzemiński Władysław (1935) [Rozwój jednostki...], “Forma”, no. 3, pp. 17.

Strzemiński Władysław (1935) Hasło przeciw stabilizatorom sztuki, “Tygodnik Artystów”, no. 14, p. 2.

Strzemiński Władysław (1936) Aspekty rzeczywistości, “Forma”, no. 5, pp. 6-13.

Strzemiński Władysław (1936) Surogaty sztuki, “Budowa”, no. 1, pp. 3-6.

Strzemiński Władysław (2016) Teoria widzenia, Łódź: Muzeum Sztuki.

Turowski Andrzej (1997) Awangardowe marginesy, Warszawa: Instytut Kultury.

Turowski Andrzej (1998) Tradycja, historia i myśl rosyjskiej awangardy artystycznej, [in:] A. Turowski, Między sztuką a komuną: Teksty awangardy rosyjskiej 1910–1932, Kraków: Universitas, pp. 11-44.

Wright Erik O. (2010) Envisioning Real Utopias, London: Verso.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-17

Issue

Section

Part III. Case Studies - ARTICLES