(De)Stabilisation of Architecture

Abstract

In the second half of the 20th century, dynamic social, cultural, economic and political transformations sparked criticism of theories that viewed cities and their architecture as static, normative and materially fixed forms. At the same time, there emerged a need to acknowledge the importance of continuously evolving relationships and processes, along with diverse mean-ings and interpretative possibilities.
By viewing buildings as processes in constant interaction with contemporary society and its needs, we also challenge the notion that they are materially fixed and inviolable. Emphasis on architectural interactivity leads to a redefinition of traditional practices and attitudes, opening up new possibilities, diverse pathways and modes of action. Shifting the focus from permanence and immutability toward dynamism and transformation undermines stability and clarity, while fostering creative thinking and greater flexibility. Openness to changing contexts and needs results in the creation of more sustainable and userfriendly places that also respect the environment. Questioning architecture as a static structure paves the way for a multiplicity of approaches, interpretations, and the multidimensional complexity of dynamic interactions.
In this article, we will undertake a closer examination of the potential unleashed by embracing change and abandoning values such as permanence and immutability in favour of the dynamization of architecture, viewed as a compelling example of de-coincidence.